
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Eurovision Song Contest changes voting rules after controversial allegations against Israel - 2
10 Demonstrated Tips to Boost Your New Android Cell phone: A Thorough Aide - 3
How a niche Catholic approach to infertility treatment became a new talking point for MAHA conservatives - 4
5 Chiefs That Changed Our Opinion on Film - 5
Gaza Strip sees flooding after heavy rainfall
Monetary Wellness: Planning Tips for Independence from the rat race
6 Popular Ladies' Aromas On the planet
Five held on suspicion of planning attack on German Christmas market
Sheinelle Jones will cohost fourth hour of 'Today' with Jenna Bush Hager: Here's what to know about her
Go on A Careful spending plan: Modest Objections for Your List of must-dos
Top 20 Wellbeing and Wellness Applications for a Sound Way of life
Novo Nordisk justifies reasoning behind failed GLP-1 Alzheimer's trials
Figure out how to Use Your Brain research Degree in the Gig Market
Instructions to Redo Your Kona SUV for Improved Tasteful Allure and Usefulness












